Week 3 - Fitzpatrick - Human Development in Pregnancy, Birth, and Infancy

For the third week of class, we had to read chapters 3-5 or the Lifesmart text, with Chapter 3 covering pregnancy and prenatal development, chapter 4 covering birth and the newborn child (birth-1 month), and chapter 5 covering infancy (1 month – 24 months). Chapter 3 gives a brief overview of the biology of human development during pregnancy. Such topics included in the chapter are standard biology, including the significance of chromosomes, DNA, and genes, specific hereditary disorders, prenatal development, and the effects of the environment on the developing fetus, including teratogens, such as infectious diseases and various chemical substances located in the body throughout prenatal development (69,70). Chapter 4 begins to touch base on the beginning of the cognitive development aspect of human development in neonates, or infant from the moment of birth until 1 month (90). Topics included in this chapter include labor stages, childbirth methods, complication during childbirth, specifically anoxia and prematurity, and neonate characteristics. Chapter 5 touches on the continuing physical and cognitive development of a child, along with the beginning of establishing emotional development in infancy. Such topics include perceptual development (visual, depth, and auditory), language development, the importance of relationships, reciprocal interactions and emotion expression in the creation of emotional development in an infant.
            One topic that really stood out to me was the subject of bonding in chapter 4 on page 96. I have mentioned before that I am a proud father of two boys, 8 and 12. One thing that I do not often include in that statement is that my older son is legally my son through adoption, and the younger one is technically my step-son. I was not around during these stages for my older son but was around for the infancy years of my stepson. During my stepson’s infant years, his father was not in the picture. His mother had to go back to work due to her recent separation, so I was there to fill the void when she could not be around. For this reason, we began to build a bond. Much like the book details, we connected on a physical level, then we began to learn about each other and understand each other cognitively. I knew his like and dislikes, I learned how to take care of him and connect with him on an independent level, which in return created a sense of love and trust between us, not as an adult to child, but as father and son. Like the book states that these connections are crucial for a child’s well-being (96), and that it is not about the amount of time spent but the quality of time spent that influences the connection (96), I am one that can attest to this as our bond is just as strong, to be honest probably stronger, than that of him and his biological father, who re-entered his life two years later.

            One thing that shocked me while reading was, in the evaluation of Piaget, the challenge that children can accomplish tasks at earlier ages than Piaget believed (113). Stage 5 of Piaget’s theory suggests that in this stage repetition of the action occurs, but with variation, indicating experimentation and an interest for their own sake/amusement (113). When I read this stage, my initial thought was “this sounds more like the ‘terrible twos’.” I then thought of my niece who just recently turned 2 this past month. She is well past the 18-month cutoff age of stage 5, but still seems to embark on these same repetitive actions, but in different manners, to recognize the results.  Although Piaget was simplistic in his overall human development theory as noted in chapter 2, it is my opinion that his timeline of cognitive development in infancy is correct.

Comments

  1. Hi Todd, I really enjoyed reading this weeks blog. I just wanted to know a little bit about your older son and the relationship with your younger son. The fact that you don't outright mention that your sons are yours by other adults, is commendable. I think because you don't specify, the connection you guys can grow stronger. Due to the fact you adopted your oldest son, how have you been able to make the same type of connections as to your younger son?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hey! Those are some very good questions! It's actually kind of funny after reading this past week's material. We started off good, hit a rocky phase for a bit, but now my older son and I get along very well. I think because both boys were separated from their biological fathers, although he was older and his development was farther along which made it harder for me to bond because he was already in school full time and I did not get as much one-on-one time with him, he was jealous of my younger son because he was getting something that my older son never had the opportunity for. However, Over the past few months, as I wrote about in this week's blog, we have been growing a much stronger bond as he begins to get get older and mature and more we become more relatable to each other.

      Delete
  2. Todd,
    Regarding your view on the parent (step-parent) to infant bond. I also found this very interesting to read about. I personally have not experienced this bond, but have watched the process occur through my nephew and his step-mother. She spent a lot of time with my nephew as my brother worked long hours. She was primarily the one who cared for him through his infancy stage and was truly like a mother to him. 8 years later, they still have a special bond that I nor anyone in my family can quite comprehend.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That is amazing that you were able to connect with your step son. I am very glad that you did. Many step parents do not want to get involved, as if the responsibility was purely the other parent's role. When two couples come together and the other parent has a child, he/she need to know that they also have to accept that child, as if they were theirs. Children need to feel a sense of security as discussed in text, to be able to thrive in life. You have no idea , how many children ,who I have as students, feel such disconnected with their biological parent. I think many parents do not see this need and they rather be on their phones or tablets instead of bonding with their child.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Todd, I feel like your points were very sound and your refection was spot. I also found the subject on bonding to stand out to me as well. My family bonds and relationship bonds are very important in my life. I was able to connect with the bonds described in the chapter to relationships I have in real life. Although I don't have kids, I do have strong bonds with my parents and siblings. I was also able to relate to stages in childhood to everyday life as well because I have younger family members.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 7 - Fitzpatrick - Dying and Spirituality

Week 2 - Fitzpatrick - Theories of Development